It’s so obvious the anti-abortion movement feels threatened by the work of Black people and the movement work we create.
Discussions like this demonstrate how issues usually considered separate are outcomes of the same systems of domination and oppression.
All #BadFaithMedicine Articles
If Rev. Nelson and Human Coalition really wanted to support Black people, their efforts would be supporting the Black people in the streets.
Doctors are supposed to “do no harm” and inform patients of all their options, not provide them with coercive, false information.
There are a lot of numbers in our charts and graphs, but one thing is clear: the anti-abortion movement is loaded.
North Carolina’s 2019 legislative session closed with uncertainty about the fate of Medicaid expansion in the state, along with the fate of the millions of taxpayer dollars that don’t belong in the hands of fake clinics.
Collection of people’s menstrual cycles by anti-abortion state officials as well as anti-abortion organizations is not only a gross overreach, but is also dangerous.
Intersectionality Threatens the Anti-Abortion Movement Because It Challenges White Men’s Ill-Gotten Power
Beyond misunderstanding intersectional feminism, it’s clear that “pro-life” leaders are fanning the flames of gender panic, racial dog whistles, and Christian fundamentalism to shore up their base.
The 2018 NIFLA case and recent North Dakota lawsuit highlight a deep hypocrisy that underlies the anti-abortion movement’s self-serving and ideologically inconsistent definition of what constitutes the right to free speech.
Who Else Has Had it With The ‘Abortion Pill Reversal’ Doctor’s Nonsense? University of California, San Diego
Delgado’s so called abortion pill reversal work is particularly offensive to pregnant people and abortion patients, as well as the clinicians who conduct real research to study and improve abortion care for patients.
The unethical experiment of abortion pill reversal started with one anti-abortion doctor’s decision to experiment on a woman with the progesterone treatment back in 2012, and the subsequent publication of his very-limited data gathered from a handful of women. This led to an unethical, inconclusive study of abortion pill reversal, upon which all of the talking points and dangerous legislative proposals of abortion reversal proponents are based.